Categories
Archive Authors E.J. Hutchinson Nota Bene The Natural Family

Westminsterian Aristotelianism: Marriage (4)

As I noted last time, Samuel Willard’s next order of business in his exposition of Westminster Shorter Catechism Q/A 64 is to discuss the mutual duties of husbands and wives–those to which they are equally obliged–before discussing their peculiar or proper duties–those to which they are unequally obliged. The first of these duties is what Willard […]

Categories
Archive Authors E.J. Hutchinson Nota Bene The Natural Family

Westminsterian Aristotelianism: Marriage (3)

Previously, we remarked that Samuel Willard first subdivides “political” relation into “public” and “private” (=”oeconomical,” i.e., pertaining to the household), and then divides the latter into the relations of husband and wife and master and servant. He then discusses the marriage relation, as was discussed in the previous post. He then continues as follows: These […]

Categories
Archive Authors Eric Parker Nota Bene Philosophy The Natural Family

Wesminsterian Aristotelianism: Marriage (2)

In the last post, we saw that Samuel Willard recognizes only one natural “order of superiority,” that of parents over children. All other relations of superior and inferior are what he calls “political.” We further saw that he divides the “political” into the two spheres of public and private, the former of which is called […]

Categories
Archive Authors E.J. Hutchinson Natural Law Nota Bene The Natural Family

Westminsterian Aristotelianism: Marriage

  In Politics 1259a-b, Aristotle distinguishes between the type of authority fathers have over children and that possessed by husbands over wives as follows: “Of household management we have seen that there are three parts—one is the rule of a master over slaves, which has been discussed already, another of a father, and the third of a […]