12 Oct 2017
Posted by E.J. Hutchinson 
We haven't had a Hemmingsen post in a while, and I know how it has made you pine. Fret not; I'm here for you. In their discussion of the virtues, the magisterial Reformers followed the classical tradition in considering religion to fall under the category of, or to be a part of, justice, which can be conveniently...
Read more → 03 Oct 2017
Posted by Mark Jones 
Paul Zahl and Tullian Tchividjian are busy writing love letters (See here and here) to one another on Tullian's personal website. Zahl's article makes the following contention: "I would go so far as to say that Tullian’s personal experience, as bad as you want to make it out, has qualified him (and...
Read more → 10 Aug 2017
Posted by Steven Wedgeworth 
Some of our friends are arguing about Capitalism and Marxism, so I thought we would do what we usually do-- turn to the archives! What did the stuffy dead guys say about this? That's a big task, though (and one that we have been doing piece by piece over time), and so, true to form, I'll here focus on Calvin....
Read more → 04 Aug 2017
Posted by E.J. Hutchinson 
In Politics 1259a-b, Aristotle distinguishes between the type of authority fathers have over children and that possessed by husbands over wives as follows: "Of household management we have seen that there are three parts—one is the rule of a master over slaves, which has been discussed already,...
Read more → 25 Jul 2017
Posted by E.J. Hutchinson 
It's 2017, and so we should remember that there were several, not just one or two, important facets of the project of Reformation undertaken in the sixteenth century. One of these was to exalt the estate of marriage as a high and holy one, and not simply an option for second-class Christians who can't...
Read more → 01 May 2017
Posted by E.J. Hutchinson 
Richard Hooker famously (?) said: "A gross error it is, to think that regal power ought to serve for the good of the body, and not of the soul; for men’s temporal peace, and not for their eternal safety: as if God had ordained kings for no other end and purpose but only to fat up men like hogs, and to see that...
Read more → 30 Jan 2017
Posted by E.J. Hutchinson 
Augustine was not a legal positivist, which is to say, he knew that human laws and customs could not be ultimate. If they are out of accord with a higher law (viz. natural law or divine law), they are not truly binding because not truly just. The opposite of this position, of course, is the position...
Read more → 23 Nov 2016
Posted by Andrew Fulford 
Dr. Feser has been writing on the doctrine of hell and punishment these days. I wanted to highlight some very useful arguments he makes connecting punishment to natural law. He says in his recent post, "Does God damn you?": Now, given what has been said, happiness – which is, again, the realization...
Read more → 22 Nov 2016
Posted by E.J. Hutchinson 
It is well known that the Magisterial Reformers treated the Decalogue as a summary of the moral law, that is, as teaching the precepts of the law of nature. In that way, "divine law"--the moral law as revealed--was to serve as a standard for public life in concord with natural law, since the two are the same...
Read more → 15 Sep 2016
Posted by Alastair Roberts 
Since our founding, TCI has been committed to affirming the natural family and varieties of "household economics" as essential components to any sort of Christian political vision. Given the confusions of our day, this has required us to interact with both the push for modern egalitarianism and the reactionary...
Read more →