• Home
  • About
  • An Introduction to TCI
  • Archive
  • Contact

Martin on “Plato at the Googleplex”

1 Comment
 20 Mar 2014   Posted by E.J. Hutchinson


In the most recent Atlantic, Clancy Martin reviews Rebecca Newberger Goldstein’s Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won’t Go Away and discusses the resurgence of popular philosophy, something that has a pedigree going back to antiquity (Seneca is a personal favorite).

But Goldstein wisely doesn’t take philosophy’s revival for granted in a culture committed to an increasingly materialistic worldview—materialistic in the philosophical sense, meaning convinced that the scientific study of matter in motion holds the answers to all our questions. The impetus for Goldstein’s ingenious, entertaining, and challenging new book is the theoretical version of the very practical problem I confronted when I graduated from college: Now that we have science, do we really need philosophy? Doesn’t science “bake bread” (not to mention make money) in a way that philosophy never has? Science is responsible for the grand upward march of civilization—so we are often told—but what accomplishments can philosophy claim?

    Share This

Written by E.J. Hutchinson
E.J. Hutchinson is Assistant Professor of Classics at Hillsdale College.


Related Posts


The Human Condition and Christian Psychology
July 8, 2017

Homunculism and the Mind
June 7, 2013

Mostly Dead is Partly Alive: A Future for Philosophy?
May 29, 2013



1 Comment

Andrew Fulford
7 years ago



The irony of asking “why do we need philosophy?”–itself a philosophical question–is lost on these folks, one supposes. If philosophy “begins in wonder”, if it is simply the attempt to answer the natural question “why?”, how could science ever be motivated if not by a philosophical instinct?






      © 2017–2020 The Calvinist International. All rights reserved.